In this, my first year of having the
                privilege of chairing the National Music Council Education Awards
                panel, I have been bowled over by the difficulty of separating the
                great applications from the merely good. Whilst we would have been
                happy to have seen more detail in some areas, and some submissions
                did hide their light under a bushel somewhat, I am gratified to report
                that we have had no submissions about which nothing positive could
                be said. Indeed I am informed that the quality has probably been
                at its highest this year, reflecting well on the hard work and indeed
                hard cash that has been going into music provision in Local Authorities
                this year. The Tune In Year of Music initiative in 2009/10 has undoubtedly
                raised the profile of music provision during the year in question,
                and as I write the Henley Review is to be welcomed as a long-overdue “all
                ends up” look at the good points and bad points of the music
                education system in England.  
              UK music education may well be the best in world. It is incredibly
                diverse, reflecting our multi-cultural society effectively in many
                areas. It is full of talent, whether that be in teachers, workshop
                leaders, pupils and even humble administrators! In the best areas
                it offers children the most amazing opportunities to make music and
                to compose. It benefits from an extraordinary amount of attention
                from so many people, and an enormous amount of research is going
                on into the holistic benefits to pupils provided by musical education. 
              And yet there are still some Local Authorities who don’t “get
                it”. The National Music Council Awards are lucky enough to
                reflect the best practice in the field, and hold a mirror up to those
                Authorities and their Music Services who do the best work in the
                best way, and benefit their children accordingly. Getting the message
                across to those Authorities who are less successful in these areas
                is a whole different matter, and one that we hope the Henley Review
                will address.  
              My grateful thanks go the panel who have put countless hours of
                effort into assessing the applications. This year they were, in alphabetical
                order, Leonora Davies, Kathryn Deane, James Hannam, Fiona Harvey,
                Ben Lane, Alok Nayak, and Alistair Salmond.  
              And we are also very grateful for the continuing association with
                the PRS for Music Foundation, who are once again offering their awards
                for provision in creativity and new music, and Jazz Services Ltd,
                who provide special awards for the provision of education in jazz.
                These awards go a long way towards to enabling us to recognise good
                practice wherever it occurs.  
              Thanks must also go to both the Federation of Music Services and
                the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, as well as Richard
                Hallam, National Music Participation Director in England, for their
                promotion of the awards. We are grateful for all your support.  
              But the last word of thanks must surely go, on behalf of pupils
                of all ages, to the music teachers, staffs of music services, workshop
                leaders, and indeed all those who contribute to our world-class music
                education. Without you, the UK would be a much less musical, indeed
                poorer, place. 
              Robin Osterley 
                Chair, Awards Panel 
              
              
             |